Efficient source of shaped single photons based on an integrated diamond nanophotonic system

ABSTRACT

Sources of shaped single photons based on an integrated diamond nanophotonic system are provided.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/290,842, filed Dec. 17, 2021, which is hereby incorporate by reference in its entirety.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

This invention was made with government support under 2012023 and 1734011 and 1941583 awarded by National Science Foundation (NSF) and under DE-SC0020115 awarded by U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and under FA9550-17-1-0002 and FA9550-16-1-0323 awarded by U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR). The government has certain rights in this invention.

BACKGROUND

Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to nanophotonic systems, and more specifically, to efficient sources of shaped single photons.

BRIEF SUMMARY

According to embodiments of the present disclosure, sources of shaped single photons based on an integrated diamond nanophotonic system are provided.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1A is a photon creation schematic. The four-level system of the SiV spin is coherently driven by alternating initialization (Ω_(init)) and photon generation (Ω_(cont)) optical pulses, producing a train of temporally shaped photons which are efficiently collected with an overcoupled nanophotonic cavity.

FIG. 1B is a measurement setup schematic. A nanophotonic cavity containing an SiV is cooled to 50 mK in a dilution refrigerator and pumped to coherently create single, arbitrarily-shaped photons. Pump pulses are shaped using an acousto-optic modulator, and pump light is filtered out of the single-photon stream by a free space Fabry-Pérot cavity.

FIG. 2A: Photon extraction efficiency is shown in the color plot as a function of cavity-waveguide coupling κ_(w) and unwanted cavity loss rate κ_s. Contours aid readability of color map. Optimal extraction efficiency is maximized by trading off atom-photon interaction probability, proportional to (κ_(s)+κ_(w))⁻¹, for a higher cavity-waveguide coupling rate κ_(w). The dashed-dot line cut corresponds to κ_(s)=89 GHz, the unwanted loss rate of this device, which is determined by fabrication imperfections. The red star highlights this device with waveguide coupling rate κ_(w)=240 GHz, which is nearly optimal for the given κ_(s).

FIG. 2B is a scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of the nanophotonic cavity is overlaid with the simulated electric field, and loss rates are labeled, where κ_(s)=κ_(scat)+κ_(left).

FIG. 2C: The simulated quasipotential shape of the cavity shows that there is a lower and shorter potential barrier on the weak mirror side. This corresponds to the coupling to the right waveguide being the dominant loss rate (κ_(w)>>κ_(s)).

FIGS. 3A-F illustrate pulse-shaped single-photon generation. Figs. A, C, and E display the temporal profile of the coherent control pulse and detected single photon. FIG. 3A: A square control pulse produces an exponentially decaying photon. FIG. 3B: A Gaussian single photon. FIG. 3C: A single photon distributed over ten time bins (FIG. 3E). Figs. B, D, and F display the normalized second order correlation of photon arrivals for the exponential, Gaussian, and ten peaked photons respectively. The insets show a zoomed-in window around i=0, which is integrated to calculate g⁽²⁾ (0).

FIG. 4 : Statistics of consecutive n-photon streams detected during a 24-hour acquisition at a 405 kHz repetition rate and 57% average duty cycle, showing detection of up to 11 photons in a row. Exponential decay fit indicates a total source-to-detector efficiency of 14.9%.

FIGS. 5A-D: Hyperfine splitting due to the ²⁹Si nuclear spin (FIG. 5A) gives rise to a four-level ground state manifold. Pumping on the electron-spin flipping transition with Ω_(cont) results in the generation of photons with two nuclear-state dependent frequencies

and

. FIG. 5B: Sweeping the control pulse frequency selectively tunes

and

into resonance with the filter cavity, which enables the measurement of the spectrum of the emitted photons. FIG. 5C: Pulse sequence for attempting to measure either two consecutive photons at nuclear-state dependent frequencies

and

or at nuclear-state dependent frequencies

and

. FIG. 5D: (upper curve)

(τ) auto-correlation measurements of the photons emitted at

show antibunching at zero time delay, and bunching after emission of 113.8±3.8 photons (1.48 ms timescale). (lower curve)

(τ) cross-correlation function for the two consecutively emitted photons at

and

shows anti-bunching after emission of 110.6±2.4 photons, suggesting that the nuclear polarization is preserved for repeated generation of up to 110 photons.

FIG. 6 depicts a classical computing node according to embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 7A-D: photonic cavities.

FIG. 8A: Quasipotential for this device.

FIG. 8B: Relative hole geometry parameters in units of the nominal lattice constant.

FIG. 8C: Scale depiction of cavity top view.

FIG. 8D: Simulated photonic band-structure diagrams for representative unit cells from each cavity section.

FIGS. 9A-E: Mode volume increases for lower potential barriers due to slower decay within the mirror region.

FIGS. 10A-B: The mirror-waveguide transition region for the right-hand side of the device.

FIG. 11A: Reflection spectrum of the nanophotonic cavity coupled to six SiV centers.

FIG. 11B: Measured minimum reflection of the SiV spectral feature normalized to the cavity dip versus its detuning from the cavity resonance.

FIG. 12 : Reflection spectrum of nanophotonic cavity coupled to a single SiV center and fit to Equation 4.

FIG. 13 : Level diagram of our system whose dynamics are encoded in Equation 15.

FIG. 14A: Model fit of a Gaussian photon generated from the given pulse, including photon and pulse data also shown in FIG. 3 .

FIG. 14B: Simulated expectation values of operators for the same simulation as in FIG. 14A.

FIGS. 15A-B: Experimental data and model prediction.

FIG. 16 : Simulated g⁽²⁾ functions assuming various qubit decay rates γ_(t) and a control pulse separation of 150 ns.

FIGS. 17A-B: Diagram of the (A) optical setup and (B) control flow used in this experiment.

FIG. 18 :

auto-correlation measurements of the photons emitted at frequency

at varying repetition rates, showing an approximately constant bunching time scale.

FIG. 19A-D: Pulse sequence and measurements.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

An efficient, scalable source of shaped single photons that can be directly integrated with optical fiber networks and quantum memories is useful for many protocols in quantum information science. We demonstrate a deterministic source of arbitrarily temporally shaped single-photon pulses with high efficiency (detection efficiency=14.9%) and purity (g⁽²⁾(0)=0.0168) and streams of up to 11 consecutively detected single photons using a silicon-vacancy center in a highly directional fiber-integrated diamond nanophotonic cavity. Combined with previously demonstrated spin-photon entangling gates, this system enables on-demand generation of streams of correlated photons such as cluster states and could be used as a resource for robust transmission and processing of quantum information.

Single optical photons play an essential role in quantum information tasks ranging from quantum communication to measurement-based quantum computing. Many protocols in quantum communication use single photons as information carriers between remote locations since photons experience little decoherence while propagating in an optical fiber or free space over long distances. An efficient, scalable source of single photons is therefore extremely useful in quantum information science and technology. The most promising approaches for realizing single-photon sources are based on single atoms, ions, or artificial atoms coupled to optical cavities. The underlying idea is that by promoting an atom to its excited state in a controlled way, only one photon is emitted per excitation cycle. Meanwhile, the encapsulating optical cavity ensures a high probability of photon collection into a well-defined optical mode. Numerous state-of-the-art demonstrations of single-photon sources have utilized solid-state, cavity-integrated self-assembled quantum dots, which have recently been used in an experiment demonstrating in-fiber single-photon detection efficiencies of above 50%.

However, in addition to single photons and linear optical elements, key quantum communication applications such as complex quantum networks will eventually require the use of more advanced components such as quantum memories and quantum repeaters to correct loss errors in communication channels or serve as a deterministic nonlinearity to enable quantum logic gates between itinerant photons. The necessity of integrating single photons with other components of future quantum networks creates additional requirements that many present-day single-photon sources do not meet: control over the photon frequency, bandwidth, and temporal profile. In particular, leading quantum memory systems have limited bandwidths, often on the MHz scale, which is several orders of magnitude smaller than the bandwidths of typical state-of-the-art single-photon sources. While bandwidth-tailored sources have been realized with neutral-atoms, trapped ions, and quantum dots, such systems with high end-to-end efficiencies, compatibility with scalable device fabrication, and photonic integration have yet to be demonstrated.

In this Letter, we present a versatile, fiber-coupled single-photon source based on a silicon-vacancy center in diamond which features high efficiency, purity, temporal control, integrability, and access to auxiliary spin memory registers. It can also directly interface with existing quantum memories, enabling future compatibility with repeater-based quantum networks as well as protocols for generation of streams of entangled photonic graph states, which are key resources in rapid one-way quantum communication and measurement-based quantum computation protocols.

Our system consists of a single negatively charged silicon-vacancy center (SiV) in a diamond nanophotonic cavity. The SiV is an inversion-symmetric point defect which features an optically accessible quantum memory that can be embedded in nanofabricated structures while maintaining excellent spin and optical coherence. Our cavity-quantum electrodynamics (CQED) system exhibits strong light-matter coupling, characterized by the single-photon Rabi frequency and cavity and atomic energy decay rates {g, κ, γ}=2π×{6.81 GHz, 329 GHz, 0.1 GHz}, resulting in a cooperativity of C≈6. Unlike in previous experiments where the magnetic field was oriented along the main symmetry axis of the SiV, we apply a magnetic field nearly orthogonal to the SiV's symmetry axis, giving rise to a four-level system corresponding to the ground (|↓

, |↑

) and optically excited (|↓′

, |↑′

) states of the SiV's electronic hole spin. The orthogonal field orientation results in spin-flipping optical transitions becoming allowed, hence enabling fast spin initialization and photon generation.

The protocol for single-photon generation in this system is illustrated schematically in FIG. 1A. First, the four-level system is initialized in |↑

by optically pumping the spin flipping transition |↓

→|↑′

using a classical driving field with Rabi frequency Ω_(init). Then, the population is coherently transferred to a single photon using a control pulse with Rabi frequency Ω_(cont) to drive the transition |↑

→|↓′

. Repeated application of this pulse sequence generates streams of single photons.

The temporal profile of the single-photon wavepackets can be tuned on timescales much longer than the excited state |↓′

lifetime due to the long-lived quantum memory of the SiV spin. In the limit of weak driving |Ω_(cont)|<<Γ, where Γ is the cavity-enhanced decay rate along |↓′

→|↓

, the dynamics of the excited state |↓′

adiabatically follows the excitation process and the photon linewidth is limited only by the coherence of the spin-levels {|↓

, |↑

} and the control laser's linewidth, rather than the intrinsic lifetime of the SiV excited state |→′

. By modulating the strength and shape of the control pulse Ω_(cont) (t), we temporally shape the single photon.

The schematic of our experimental setup is shown in FIG. 1B. Devices are placed in a dilution refrigerator at T≈50 mK to reduce the population of phonons which cause thermal mixing between orbital states. This extends the coherence of the ground-state spin, enabling generation of temporally longer photon pulse shapes. Optical control pulses are delivered, and single photons are collected via a tapered optical fiber, which is coupled to the device. On the return path, the generated single photons are filtered from the control pulses by a free space Fabry-Pérot cavity (linewidth=160 MHz, finesse=312) before being detected by superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (SNSPDs).

In order to maximize the photon collection efficiency from the emitter, we implement a novel asymmetric nanophotonic cavity design which strikes a balance between high quality factor of the cavity and strong waveguide damping. In this design, for a given unwanted cavity loss rate κ_(s) set by fabrication imperfections, there is an optimal choice of waveguide coupling κ_(w) (FIG. 2A). We achieve this optimal trade-off in the asymmetric diamond nanophotonic cavity as pictured in the scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of FIG. 2B, which preferentially sends light to the coupling waveguide (i.e. to the right side).

These devices are designed using the analogy between a massive particle tunneling through a potential barrier and the evanescent decay of a photon in a photonic band gap. The asymmetric “quasipotential” for a photon in this device is shown in FIG. 2C. It illustrates both the preferential coupling to the measurement port through the lower and narrower barrier on the right side of the cavity as well as a deep well needed for the tight confinement of the optical mode. The simulated electric field overlay in FIG. 2B illustrates this wavelength scale confinement

$\left( {{{mode}{volume}} = {0.67\left( \frac{\lambda}{n} \right)^{3}}} \right).$

An in-depth discussion of the new photonic crystal cavity design techniques used here is provided in section I of the Supplementary Information.

We demonstrate generation of bandwidth-tailored photons with this platform in FIG. 3 . We start by applying a 1 μs square pump pulse (FIG. 3A), and observing an exponentially shaped emitted photon, directly illustrating the optical pumping dynamics from |↑

into |↓

expected from a time-independent pump pulse. The photon duration of ˜1 μs compared to the ˜1 ns excited state lifetime highlights the ability of this protocol to generate narrow-bandwidth photons, which is independently verified using a separate narrow filter cavity with linewidth below 5 MHz (FIG. 5B). To ensure the presence of only a single photon in each wavepacket, we measure the second order correlation, g⁽²⁾, of the generated photon stream by using a beam splitter and recording the arrival times of photons on a pair of SNSPDs. The results of these measurements are shown in the lower panels of FIG. 3 . A value of g⁽²⁾(0)=0.1689<0.5 (FIG. 3B) of the exponentially shaped photon confirms the quantum nature of the measured state of light and the presence of a single excitation.

Next, we apply shorter and more powerful Gaussian control pulses to create Gaussian single photons with full-width half-maxima of −20 ns (FIG. 3C) and observe a substantially reduced g⁽²⁾(0)=0.0168 (FIG. 3D). We note that photons of this approximate duration are optimal for interfacing with existing SiV quantum memories.

We confirm our understanding of the system using a density matrix model to predict the photon shapes resulting from the applied Gaussian control pulse. FIG. 3C confirms that our model matches the measured photon shape well. By inverting this model, we can calculate the control pulse Ω_(cont)(t) required to generate arbitrarily shaped photon wavepackets. For example, in FIG. 3E, we demonstrate a ten-peaked single photon, which could be useful for time-binned multiplexing and efficient high-dimensional quantum communication. Auto-correlation measurements again demonstrate the single-photon nature of the ten-peaked photon with a low g⁽²⁾(0)=0.0642. The difference in single-photon purity between the three generated photon shapes can be attributed to optically-induced heating, which results in a reduced spin lifetime and increased value of g⁽²⁾ (0) for longer-duration photons.

Next, we measure the total system efficiency by generating short Gaussian photons (as in FIG. 3C) continuously over a 24 hour period. The repetition rate of the pump pulses is 405 kHz. We record the number of consecutive $-photon streams detected (FIG. 4 ) as a proxy for the complexity of multi-photon states that are necessary for implementation of quantum information protocols such as one-way quantum communication or computing with photonic cluster states. Notably, the experiment was operating autonomously during this 24-hour run. Our experiment control software automatically handles SiV ionization and spectral diffusion events, as well as filter cavity locking, making this a realistic demonstration of a practical single-photon source.

The exponential decay fit to the n-photon event rates reveals a single-photon detection efficiency of 14.9%. This decrease compared to the ideal photon extraction efficiency of 62% is primarily due to losses in the filtering setup (0.5-0.6), waveguide-fiber coupling efficiency (0.7), and finite detuning of the cavity. Despite these extra losses, this single-photon efficiency is competitive with state-of-the-art single-photon sources. A single-photon detection rate of 31 kHz is achieved, indicating an average duty cycle of 57%, which is primarily limited by ionization of the SiV and software overhead.

As a first step toward generation of spin-photon entangled states and more complex multi-photon entangled states, we next explore the light-matter interface with the auxiliary nuclear spin memory associated with the ²⁹Si isotope. The hyperfine coupling between the electronic hole spin and the nuclear spin additionally splits the electronic-hole Zeeman ground state manifold creating four levels in the ground-state manifold (FIG. 5A). As a result, the ²⁹SiV system can emit photons with two nuclear spin dependent photon frequencies,

and

. Such a system can be used to generate complex multi-photon entangled states such as cluster states or graph states, as proposed in, by coherently manipulating the nuclear state in between emissions of subsequent photons.

In order to probe the nuclear spin dependent emission frequency of a cavity-integrated ²⁹SiV, we filter the single-photon signal using a significantly narrower 5 MHz linewidth filter cavity, locked close to the |↓′

→|↓

transition. The photons are generated via the same scheme as before, whereby a single initialization pulse is used to initialize the electron regardless of the initial nuclear spin state due to the small hyperfine splitting as compared to the optical transition bandwidth. The filter cavity frequency is held constant while the frequency of the pump laser is swept tuning the frequency of the emitted photons. This selectively tunes

and

into resonance with the filter cavity, enabling the measurement of the spectrum of the emitted photons. Two narrow peaks are observed in the detected single-photon spectrum with a splitting of 52 MHz (FIG. 5B), as expected from the hyperfine splitting from the ²⁹Si nuclear spin.

An initial step toward generating multi-photon states with entanglement mediated by the ²⁹SiV nuclear spin is to show that multiple photons can be generated while preserving the nuclear spin state. Therefore, we measure correlations between subsequently emitted photons at the two different nuclear spin dependent emission frequencies,

and

(FIG. 5C). We measure the degree of second-order correlations

(τ) of photons emitted at frequency

, observing bunching on long timescales. We then measure the intensity cross-correlation g

(τ)=

(t)

(t+τ)

/

(t)

(t)

, where

and

are the intensities of the

and

emissions, respectively, and observe anti-bunching on the same timescale. These measurements indicate a 16-fold higher probability of detecting subsequently emitted photons at the same frequency, as opposed to opposite frequencies.

The bunching (antibunching) in

(τ) (

(τ)) decays after emission of 113.8±3.8 (110.6±2.4) photons. We attribute this decay to relaxation of the nucleus due to the single-photon generation process. Relaxation of the nucleus after emission of 113.8±3.8 photons would correspond to each generated photon inducing a nuclear spin flip with a probability of (0.9±0.03)%. These measurements directly demonstrate that classical correlations between the ²⁹Si nuclear spin state and the frequency of the emitted photon can persist for more than 100 consecutively emitted photons, making this a promising approach for the generation of large-scale photonic graph states.

Our experiments demonstrate an on-demand source of streams of shaped photons generated from a silicon-vacancy center in an asymmetric nanophotonic cavity in diamond. The challenge of producing a nanophotonic cavity in diamond with arbitrary coupling ratios was resolved through the development of a quasipotential design heuristic, which we believe will be of general use to the nanophotonics community. We showed that the system can generate single photons with highly tunable temporal wavepackets and high spectral purity, detecting streams of up to 11 sequential photons at experimentally useful rates due to a high source-to-detector efficiency and efficient fiber-nanophotonic integration. Given the measured g⁽²⁾(0)=0.0168, we estimate this source would provide more than a thirty-fold improvement in the single-photon detection rate when used as a replacement for a weak coherent source with equivalent two-photon detection infidelity. Furthermore, this advantage results in an exponential improvement for higher n-photon stream events, as demonstrated by the detection of 28 total 11-photon events in a 24 hour period.

Additionally, this single-photon source enables the generation of multi-photon entangled states when efficiently interfaced with a second cavity-coupled SiV, which would be used as a quantum memory to deterministically entangle subsequent photons. By demonstrating classical correlations between the built-in ²⁹Si nuclear spin state and emitted photon frequency, we also illustrate the possibility to directly generate streams of entangled photons mediated by nuclear memory. In order to demonstrate quantum correlations (i.e. entanglement) between nuclear spin and photon frequency, additional coherent control of the nucleus is necessary, which can be achieved using RF fields supplied by on-chip coplanar waveguides. Moreover, in order to realize large entangled states, mitigation of ²⁹Si memory decoherence arising from heating, which shortens the electron lifetime, is employed.

The photons generated by our source can be bandwidth and wavelength matched to existing SiV-nanophotonic quantum memory devices, which will be required for complex quantum networking schemes involving stationary repeaters or quantum memories. Combined with the demonstrated ability to create large multi-photon streams on demand, this method enables the production and detection of high photon number linear cluster states with only moderate improvements to the setups demonstrated here. For these reasons, our platform provides a versatile single-photon source which can be interfaced with quantum memories for the realization of quantum networking and quantum information processing tasks.

Referring now to FIG. 6 , a schematic of an example of a computing node is shown. Computing node 10 is only one example of a suitable computing node and is not intended to suggest any limitation as to the scope of use or functionality of embodiments described herein. Regardless, computing node 10 is capable of being implemented and/or performing any of the functionality set forth hereinabove.

In computing node 10 there is a computer system/server 12, which is operational with numerous other general purpose or special purpose computing system environments or configurations. Examples of well-known computing systems, environments, and/or configurations that may be suitable for use with computer system/server 12 include, but are not limited to, personal computer systems, server computer systems, thin clients, thick clients, handheld or laptop devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputer systems, mainframe computer systems, and distributed cloud computing environments that include any of the above systems or devices, and the like.

Computer system/server 12 may be described in the general context of computer system-executable instructions, such as program modules, being executed by a computer system. Generally, program modules may include routines, programs, objects, components, logic, data structures, and so on that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Computer system/server 12 may be practiced in distributed cloud computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed cloud computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote computer system storage media including memory storage devices.

As shown in FIG. 6 , computer system/server 12 in computing node 10 is shown in the form of a general-purpose computing device. The components of computer system/server 12 may include, but are not limited to, one or more processors or processing units 16, a system memory 28, and a bus 18 that couples various system components including system memory 28 to processor 16.

Bus 18 represents one or more of any of several types of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, an accelerated graphics port, and a processor or local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures. By way of example, and not limitation, such architectures include Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, Micro Channel Architecture (MCA) bus, Enhanced ISA (EISA) bus, Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) local bus, Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus, Peripheral Component Interconnect Express (PCIe), and Advanced Microcontroller Bus Architecture (AMBA). Computer system/server 12 typically includes a variety of computer system readable media. Such media may be any available media that is accessible by computer system/server 12, and it includes both volatile and non-volatile media, removable and non-removable media.

System memory 28 can include computer system readable media in the form of volatile memory, such as random access memory (RAM) 30 and/or cache memory 32. Computer system/server 12 may further include other removable/non-removable, volatile/non-volatile computer system storage media. By way of example only, storage system 34 can be provided for reading from and writing to a non-removable, non-volatile magnetic media (not shown and typically called a “hard drive”). Although not shown, a magnetic disk drive for reading from and writing to a removable, non-volatile magnetic disk (e.g., a “floppy disk”), and an optical disk drive for reading from or writing to a removable, non-volatile optical disk such as a CD-ROM, DVD-ROM or other optical media can be provided. In such instances, each can be connected to bus 18 by one or more data media interfaces. As will be further depicted and described below, memory 28 may include at least one program product having a set (e.g., at least one) of program modules that are configured to carry out the functions of embodiments of the disclosure.

Program/utility 40, having a set (at least one) of program modules 42, may be stored in memory 28 by way of example, and not limitation, as well as an operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, and program data. Each of the operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, and program data or some combination thereof, may include an implementation of a networking environment. Program modules 42 generally carry out the functions and/or methodologies of embodiments as described herein.

Computer system/server 12 may also communicate with one or more external devices 14 such as a keyboard, a pointing device, a display 24, etc.; one or more devices that enable a user to interact with computer system/server 12; and/or any devices (e.g., network card, modem, etc.) that enable computer system/server 12 to communicate with one or more other computing devices. Such communication can occur via Input/Output (I/O) interfaces 22. Still yet, computer system/server 12 can communicate with one or more networks such as a local area network (LAN), a general wide area network (WAN), and/or a public network (e.g., the Internet) via network adapter 20. As depicted, network adapter 20 communicates with the other components of computer system/server 12 via bus 18. It should be understood that although not shown, other hardware and/or software components could be used in conjunction with computer system/server 12. Examples, include, but are not limited to: microcode, device drivers, redundant processing units, external disk drive arrays, RAID systems, tape drives, and data archival storage systems, etc.

The present disclosure may be embodied as a system, a method, and/or a computer program product. The computer program product may include a computer readable storage medium (or media) having computer readable program instructions thereon for causing a processor to carry out aspects of the present disclosure.

The computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that can retain and store instructions for use by an instruction execution device. The computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but is not limited to, an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device, an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, a semiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. A non-exhaustive list of more specific examples of the computer readable storage medium includes the following: a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD), a memory stick, a floppy disk, a mechanically encoded device such as punch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructions recorded thereon, and any suitable combination of the foregoing. A computer readable storage medium, as used herein, is not to be construed as being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or other freely propagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagating through a waveguide or other transmission media (e.g., light pulses passing through a fiber-optic cable), or electrical signals transmitted through a wire.

Computer readable program instructions described herein can be downloaded to respective computing/processing devices from a computer readable storage medium or to an external computer or external storage device via a network, for example, the Internet, a local area network, a wide area network and/or a wireless network. The network may comprise copper transmission cables, optical transmission fibers, wireless transmission, routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers and/or edge servers. A network adapter card or network interface in each computing/processing device receives computer readable program instructions from the network and forwards the computer readable program instructions for storage in a computer readable storage medium within the respective computing/processing device.

Computer readable program instructions for carrying out operations of the present disclosure may be assembler instructions, instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions, machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions, state-setting data, or either source code or object code written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Smalltalk, C++ or the like, and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages. The computer readable program instructions may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider). In some embodiments, electronic circuitry including, for example, programmable logic circuitry, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), or programmable logic arrays (PLA) may execute the computer readable program instructions by utilizing state information of the computer readable program instructions to personalize the electronic circuitry, in order to perform aspects of the present disclosure.

Aspects of the present disclosure are described herein with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of the disclosure. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer readable program instructions.

These computer readable program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks. These computer readable program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable storage medium that can direct a computer, a programmable data processing apparatus, and/or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the computer readable storage medium having instructions stored therein comprises an article of manufacture including instructions which implement aspects of the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.

The computer readable program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other device to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other device to produce a computer implemented process, such that the instructions which execute on the computer, other programmable apparatus, or other device implement the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.

The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods, and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present disclosure. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). In some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts or carry out combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.

The descriptions of the various embodiments of the present disclosure have been presented for purposes of illustration, but are not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the embodiments disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the described embodiments. The terminology used herein was chosen to best explain the principles of the embodiments, the practical application or technical improvement over technologies found in the marketplace, or to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the embodiments disclosed herein. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A device for producing temporally shaped single-photon pulses, the device comprising: a diamond photonic crystal comprising a defect region, a first mirror region, and a second mirror region, wherein: the first mirror region has a first unit cell, and the second mirror region has a second unit cell different from the first unit cell, the defect region is interposed between the first mirror region and the second mirror region. 